Amy Howe

Nov 6 2020

Pennsylvania election officials and Democrats respond to Trump campaign’s plea to join Supreme Court proceedings on ballot deadline

Pennsylvania election officials urged the Supreme Court to deny the Trump campaign’s motion to join the Pennsylvania Republican Party’s appeal of a state court ruling that requires election officials to count mail-in ballots received by Nov. 6. The campaign went to the court on Wednesday afternoon, telling them that the outcome of the presidential election could hinge on the vote in Pennsylvania. By the time the election officials and the Democratic Party filed their briefs opposing the campaign’s intervention on Thursday afternoon, former Vice President Joe Biden had closed the gap with the president significantly, with the counting expected to conclude late Thursday or Friday.

The Pennsylvania Republican Party and Pennsylvania legislators are challenging a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that requires the state to count all ballots received by Friday, Nov. 6, as long as they are postmarked by Election Day, lack a postmark, or have a postmark that is not clear. The justices declined in October to put that ruling on hold or to fast-track their consideration of the Republicans’ petition for review, but Justice Samuel Alito left open the prospect that the justices could decide the case on an expedited basis after the election.

In their brief opposing review, the election officials contended that there is no need for the Trump campaign to join the proceeding because it is already adequately represented. The campaign makes the same arguments as the Republican Party, and the Republican Party is represented by the same lawyers who represented the campaign in a different case in federal court, the officials argued. Moreover, they added, the request has come too late – almost six weeks after the case first arrived at the Supreme Court.

The Pennsylvania Democratic Party is also defending the state supreme court’s ruling. It told the justices that there is no need for them to rule on the Trump campaign’s motion to join the case now, because the Supreme Court “may well not need to hear and decide” the case at all, depending on how many ballots are received during the three-day period between Election Day and Nov. 6 and whether that number actually makes a difference in the elections. Pennsylvania election officials are also segregating ballots received after the polls closed on Election Day, the Pennsylvania Democrats noted, so that they will not be mixed with other ballots.

This article is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • David Souter, retired Supreme Court justice, dies at 85
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies