Amy Howe

Jun 3 2021

Real estate agents ask court to block eviction moratorium

A group of Alabama real estate agents asked the Supreme Court on Thursday to block a federal moratorium on evictions that was imposed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. In May, a federal district judge agreed with the group that the Centers for Disease Control does not have the power to impose the policy, but she put her ruling on hold to give the government time to appeal. The Alabama Association of Realtors urged the Supreme Court to intervene on an emergency basis and lift that stay order, telling the justices that “Congress never gave the CDC the staggering amount of power it now claims.”

The moratorium at the heart of the case was imposed by the CDC in September after a similar moratorium enacted by Congress expired. The moratorium bans landlords from evicting tenants who cannot pay their rent, with fines and even criminal penalties for landlords who violate the ban. The real estate agents argue in their 35-page filing that the moratorium “shifted the pandemic’s financial burdens from the nation’s 30 to 40 million renters to its 10 to 11 million landlords – most of whom,” like the challengers in this case, “are individuals and small businesses.” The challengers say landlords have been losing over $13 billion in unpaid rent each month as a result of the policy. The moratorium is currently scheduled to expire on June 30, though the CDC has previously extended the moratorium twice, and the challengers tell the court that the agency could do so again.

In May, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich vacated the moratorium. She concluded that the moratorium went beyond the authority that Congress had given the CDC in the federal public health laws on which the agency relied to impose the order. But she put her ruling on hold while the government appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit left the stay in place, leading to Thursday’s filing.

The challengers tell the justices that the stay “will prolong the severe financial burdens borne by landlords under the moratorium,” which could reach as much as $200 billion. Moreover, they add, with the “downward trend in COVID-19 cases and the effectiveness in vaccines,” any public health rationales for the moratorium are now pretextual.

The real estate agents’ request went to Chief Justice John Roberts, who handles emergency requests from the District of Columbia. Roberts can act on the application himself, but he is more likely to refer it to the full court.

The case is Alabama Association of Realtors v. Department of Health and Human Services.

(Update, Friday, June 4, at 4:18 p.m.): On Friday, the chief justice called for a response from the Department of Health and Human Services. It is due next Thursday, June 10, by 5 p.m.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • David Souter, retired Supreme Court justice, dies at 85
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies