Amy Howe

Dec 31 2017

Natural disasters, sexual harassment focus of year-end report

Chief Justice John Roberts released his year-end report on the federal judiciary tonight. In 2016, Roberts used the report to pay homage to what he regarded as the unsung hero of the federal judiciary: the federal district judge, whom he described as a “capable administrator” but also an “active and astute problem solver.” Roberts’ 2017 report was more directly reflective of current events, focusing on the federal judiciary’s response to natural disasters – such as hurricanes in Texas, Florida, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands – and sexual harassment in the workplace.

Roberts began by acknowledging that disaster response efforts are “primarily the responsibility of the executive and legislative branches.” Although courts “cannot provide food, shelter, or medical aid,” he observed, “they must stand ready to perform their judicial functions as part of the recovery effort.” Roberts described the response of the federal judiciary to 2017’s natural disasters in some detail. He praised the “dedicated and even heroic” actions of judges and court employees, remarking that when the chief probation officer in Puerto Rico arrived at work shortly after Hurricane Maria had passed through, “he discovered 25 members of the District’s probation staff already at the office, raring to go.” And Roberts outlined some of the lessons that the judiciary had learned from this year’s catastrophes, such as the need to “pre-position essential equipment, such as satellite telephones, batteries, generators, and emergency supplies on islands and other areas susceptible to hurricanes and flooding.”

Roberts then turned to a “new challenge in the coming year”: the problem of sexual harassment in the workplace. He noted that “events in the past few weeks” – allegations against Alex Kozinski, a high-profile judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, who retired earlier this month – “have made clear that the judicial branch is not immune” from the problem. Roberts announced that he had asked the director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, the agency that supports the federal judiciary, to form a working group “to examine our practices and address these issues.” Among other things, Roberts wrote, the group should “consider whether changes are needed in our codes of conduct, our guidance to employees – including law clerks – on issues of confidentiality and reporting of instances of misconduct, our educational programs, and our rules for investigating and processing misconduct complaints.”

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies