Amy Howe

Jun 16 2020

Justices block Texas execution

Tonight the Supreme Court put a temporary hold on the execution of Texas death-row inmate Ruben Gutierrez, who had been scheduled to die at 7 p.m. EDT. In a short unsigned order, the justices granted a request by Gutierrez to stay his execution while it considers his petition to review his case on the merits.
Gutierrez has spent more than 20 years on death row for the murder of 85-year-old Escolastica Harrison. Gutierrez and an accomplice robbed Harrison of cash, beat her and stabbed her repeatedly with a screwdriver.
Until March of last year, Texas allowed Christian and Muslim inmates to have a spiritual advisor with them in the execution chamber. But on March 29, 2019, the Supreme Court put the execution of a Buddhist prisoner, Patrick Murphy, on hold to give him time to file a petition for review – unless, the court said, Texas allowed either Murphy’s spiritual advisor or another Buddhist priest to attend.
In a separate opinion agreeing with the court’s ruling in Murphy’s case, Justice Brett Kavanaugh acknowledged that states may have “a strong interest in tightly controlling access to an execution room in order to ensure that the execution occurs without any complications, distractions, or disruptions.” But a possible solution to that concern, Kavanaugh seemed to suggest, would be for the state to exclude all spiritual advisors from the execution chamber. What the state cannot do, he concluded, “is to allow Christian or Muslim inmates but not Buddhist inmates to have a religious adviser of their religion in the execution room.”
A few days later, Texas adopted a new policy that barred all chaplains and spiritual advisors from the execution chamber. That led to this lawsuit by Gutierrez, who is Catholic and who argued that the policy violates the Constitution and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, a federal law that protects the religious rights of inmates. A federal district court in Texas agreed with him and put his execution on hold, but the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit lifted the stay last Friday, clearing the way for the execution to proceed tonight unless the Supreme Court intervened.
Shortly before 6 p.m. EDT, the Supreme Court put the execution on hold while it considers Gutierrez’s petition for review. If the petition is denied, the court explained, then the stay will be lifted automatically. And in an unusual twist, the justices instructed the district court to “promptly determine, based on whatever evidence the parties provide, whether serious security problems would result if a prisoner facing execution is permitted to choose the spiritual adviser the prisoner wishes to have in his immediate presence during the execution.” The instruction suggests that at least some justices regard as central to the case the question whether Texas’ policy of excluding spiritual advisers from the execution chamber stems from genuine security concerns or instead was adopted, as Gutierrez has argued, to avoid charges that the state had discriminated against Murphy, the Buddhist inmate.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies