Amy Howe

Aug 17 2020

Justices appoint Utah law professor to defend structure of Federal Housing Finance Agency

The Supreme Court on Monday appointed Aaron Nielson, a professor at Brigham Young University’s J. Reuben Clark Law School, as a “friend of the court” in Collins v. Mnuchin, in which the justices are likely to hear argument this fall. Nielson, an expert on administrative law, will defend the constitutionality of the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency after the federal government declined to do so.

The case is a dispute between shareholders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the FHFA, which became the conservator for Fannie and Freddie after the 2008 financial crisis, over the FHFA’s 2012 financing agreement with the Treasury Department. One of the questions that the justices agreed in July to decide is whether the FHFA’s structure violates the Constitution because the agency is headed by a single director, who can be removed by the president only “for cause.” In proceedings before the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and in its brief opposing review in the Supreme Court, the Justice Department did not defend the removal restriction. The FHFA defended the restriction in the court of appeals but has not appeared in the Supreme Court.

Facing the prospect that neither side in the case would defend the removal restriction, the justices appointed Nielson, a former law clerk to Justice Samuel Alito who was a partner in the Washington, D.C., office of Kirkland & Ellis before going into academia; Nielson continues to serve “of counsel” at the firm. Such appointments are not uncommon at the Supreme Court, and the justices have a longstanding tradition of allowing the circuit justice for the circuit from which the case hails to appoint the lawyer who will brief and argue the case as a “friend of the court.” The circuit justice – here, Alito, who handles emergency appeals from the 5th Circuit – will often call on a former clerk, frequently giving the lawyer, as is true for Nielson, his first opportunity to appear before the justices. However, Justice Elena Kagan departed last term from this tradition when she appointed Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor general who has argued over 100 cases, to defend the constitutionality of the leadership structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies