Amy Howe

Sep 16 2020

Justices to hear October arguments by phone

The Supreme Court announced on Wednesday that it will start its new term in October by hearing oral arguments the same way that it did at the end of its previous term: remotely, with the justices and lawyers participating by telephone as a result of the coronavirus pandemic. Members of the public will once again be able to listen to oral arguments live, through a feed provided by the court to the media and then made available by the media to the public.

The announcement by the court’s Public Information Office came less than three weeks before the court’s October argument session is scheduled to begin. All of the cases slated for oral argument were originally on the court’s calendar in March or April of this year, but the justices canceled arguments in those months because of the pandemic. The justices then rescheduled some of the March and April cases for May, hearing oral arguments by telephone and providing live audio for the first time, but they pushed the remaining 10 cases back to the fall.

The court indicated that the October arguments will follow “the same format used for the May teleconference arguments,” when the justices took turns asking questions in order of seniority. The format drew mixed reviews in the spring: Some court watchers, most notably veteran reporter Lyle Denniston, were sharply critical, while others believed that the format was more dignified and applauded the increased participation by Justice Clarence Thomas, who rarely asks questions in the more freewheeling setting of arguments held in person. The court made clear that it had not yet made a decision about November, when the justices will hear oral arguments in (among other cases) the challenge to the Affordable Care Act, or December. “The Court will continue to closely monitor public health guidance in determining plans” for sessions later this fall, the court said.

Shortly before the court made its announcement, a group of 50 media organizations and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press sent a letter to Chief Justice John Roberts calling on the court to provide live audio access during its new term. After the announcement, the Reporters Committee said on Twitter that the decision “is a great step towards greater access and transparency” but continued to urge the court “to provide live audio for the entirety of the term.”

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Mandatory minimums, payday lending, and voting rights in first session of Supreme Court term
  • Twelve cases added to Supreme Court calendar
  • Justices take major Florida and Texas social media cases
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Mandatory minimums, payday lending, and voting rights in the first session of the court’s new term
  • Twelve cases added to Supreme Court calendar
  • Justices take major Florida and Texas social media cases
  • Consumer watchdog funding fight goes before justices
  • Court denies Alabama’s request to use voting map with only one majority-Black district
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies