Amy Howe

Oct 22 2020

Barrett nomination moves to Senate floor

Judge Amy Coney Barrett moved one step closer to becoming Justice Amy Coney Barrett on Thursday. In a hearing that Democratic senators boycotted, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted unanimously to send Barrett’s nomination to fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to the floor. The full Senate, where Republicans hold a majority, is expected to vote on Monday on Barrett’s nomination.

The committee’s 10 Democratic members declined to attend Thursday morning’s hearing, with several of them instead placing in their chairs large photos of constituents who, they say, are concerned that Barrett will vote to strike down the Affordable Care Act. The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument on Nov. 10 in a challenge to the ACA’s requirement that virtually all Americans buy health insurance; if she is confirmed on Monday, Barrett could be on the bench in time to participate in that argument.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), the chair of the committee, began the hearing by complimenting his Democratic colleagues. He noted that they had “aggressively challenged” Barrett but had not done so “inappropriately.”

Graham also had kind words for his fellow Republicans, telling them that they had asked “questions that matter to you,” but at the same time shown “a tremendous amount of discipline to make sure that on our side the hearing went well.”

Graham had even warmer words for the nominee herself, calling Thursday’s vote a “groundbreaking historic moment” for the legal community. Graham said that he had “never seen anyone more capable” than Barrett “on the law.” Barrett, Graham declared, “embraces the pro-life cause in her personal life” but “understands that judging is not a cause.”

Graham blamed the strife over judicial nominations on Senate Democrats, saying that “they started this. Not me.” And he warned that the “Democratic Party of 2020 is hellbent on changing on the rules” regarding the Supreme Court.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Justices rule Minnesota county violated takings clause
  • Supreme Court curtails Clean Water Act
  • Justices rule on challenge to FDIC order
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Justices rule Minnesota county violated takings clause
  • Supreme Court curtails Clean Water Act
  • Reading the tea leaves — Part 1
  • Justices rule on challenge to FDIC order
  • Court dismisses Title 42 case
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies