Amy Howe

Apr 5 2021

Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions

Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce a 48-hour waiting period for abortions while it appeals a federal district court’s ruling that declared the waiting period unconstitutional. Characterizing the waiting period as “materially indistinguishable” from one the Supreme Court upheld nearly 30 years ago in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, Tennessee told the justices that although 14 other states have similar laws, it is “the only State in the Nation that cannot enforce its law because of a federal judicial decree.”

In its filing on Monday in Slatery v. Bristol Regional Women’s Center, the state described the waiting period as modest. Under state law, abortion providers must “give their patients important information about abortion and its alternatives at least 48 hours before performing an abortion, except in a medical emergency,” the state said. During the four years that the waiting period was in effect, the state wrote, the number of abortions in the state “declined only slightly,” reflecting nationwide trends.

A federal district court struck down the waiting period last fall, ruling that the wait made it harder for patients to obtain abortions without providing any benefits. Waiting periods require patients to make two separate visits to an abortion clinic, U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman wrote, creating “logistical and financial obstacles” that disproportionately burden low-income patients. Tennessee’s law, Friedman added, “demeans women by implicitly questioning their decision-making ability.”

The state appealed Friedman’s ruling, and in February, a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit refused to put the ruling on hold while the appeal proceeds. That refusal led to Monday’s filing, which asks the justices to intervene and reinstate the waiting period while the litigation continues in the 6th Circuit.

In its filing, Tennessee contended that if the 6th Circuit eventually upholds the law, there is a good chance that the Supreme Court will grant review to weigh in on the correct test to determine whether abortion laws are constitutional – specifically, whether courts should balance the burdens that an abortion law imposes against its benefits, as the Supreme Court indicated in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt, or whether the court’s decision in Casey requires courts to consider only whether a law imposes a substantial obstacle, as Chief Justice John Roberts indicated last year in his separate opinion in June Medical Services v. Russo.

The state’s request goes to Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who handles emergency requests from the geographic area that includes Tennessee. Kavanaugh can act on the request himself or, as is more likely, refer it to the full court.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies