Amy Howe

May 28 2021

“Basically optimistic” Breyer on American government, missing RBG

Justice Stephen Breyer extolled the virtues of civics education and reaching out across ideological divides, arguing on Friday that when enough people want their elected officials to work together, they will do so. Breyer’s remarks, which the 82-year-old jurist made during a wide-ranging conversation with Jeffrey Rosen of the National Constitution Center, came on the same afternoon that Senate Republicans used a procedural filibuster to block legislation that would have created a bipartisan commission to investigate the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.

Breyer spoke via Zoom from his chambers at the Supreme Court, against a background of antique books and art borrowed from the National Gallery of Art, to a group of middle- and high-school students. Breyer told the students that they need to know how the U.S. government works “so that we can maintain it.” Breyer emphasized that this is “not the first time people have become discouraged with the democratic process,” and that the United States has experienced racism before. “Of course it’s a bad system,” Breyer acknowledged, “except for the others.” The American political system, Breyer stressed, is still an experiment. Breyer mused out loud, “Will it work?” “Your job,” he said to the students, “is to see that it does.”

Rosen pressed Breyer, saying that many people think the U.S. system is broken. What can we do, Rosen asked, to make it work? Breyer responded that he was “basically optimistic,” although he added that he didn’t know how much of that optimism is justified. The late Sen. Edward Kennedy, for whom Breyer worked early in his career, used to say that the country swings, Breyer explained, and will right itself eventually. He noted that he frequently saw Kennedy reach out to Republicans when he needed their support and talk to them. Once people start talking, Breyer suggested, they will eventually find some common ground.

With the justices slated to consider in the fall a Mississippi abortion law intended to challenge Roe v. Wade, Rosen also asked Breyer about the role of precedent. Breyer responded that the law is in part about stability, allowing people to plan their lives. “If you are changing it all the time,” Breyer observed, “people won’t know what to do.” On the other hand, Breyer contended, the more you change the law, the more people will ask courts to change it.

Breyer, the oldest justice on the court, has faced mounting pressure from some liberals to retire and allow President Joe Biden to nominate a younger successor while Democrats have narrow control of the Senate. Breyer did not discuss his future plans on Friday.

He spoke warmly of his colleagues at the court, telling his audience that “of course” you can be friends with justices who have very different approaches to the law. Although he and his colleagues don’t always agree on cases, Breyer made clear, “I’ve never heard a voice raised in anger.” The conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, Breyer emphasized, is a “very, very decent person.”

Breyer’s discussion of the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died in September 2020, was poignant. “I miss her,” Breyer said. And he disclosed that when talking about a case recently with one of his law clerks, he said to the clerk, “Let’s go see what Ruth thinks.”

Breyer revealed that during the pandemic he had been “driving Joanna” – his wife, a psychologist – “crazy!” He had also been “working at my word processor,” meditating (“you do feel better,” he said), “fake bike riding” on “one of those machines” – prompting several tweets about whether the justice has a Peloton – and watching reruns of the TV classic M*A*S*H.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies