Amy Howe

Oct 1 2021

Sotomayor turns down plea to block New York City vaccine mandate

The Supreme Court refused on Friday to block New York City’s requirement that all public-school employees be vaccinated for COVID-19. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who handles emergency appeals from the area that includes New York, turned down a request from four of the city’s public-school employees to temporarily block the enforcement of the mandate while they litigate their challenge in the lower courts. The city planned to enforce the mandate beginning at 5 p.m. on Friday.

The vaccine mandate, issued in an executive order on Aug. 23, requires New York City public-school employees to prove that they have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. The challengers complain that the mandate discriminates against public-school employees because other city employees, including some who work with children, are allowed to remain in their jobs without being vaccinated as long as they undergo weekly testing. Public-school employees who are not vaccinated, however, will be placed on unpaid leave.

A federal district court turned down the challengers’ request to temporarily block the enforcement of the mandate, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit declined to put the mandate on hold while the challengers appeal. That led the challengers to come to the Supreme Court on Thursday, asking the justices to step in on an emergency basis quickly. They told the justices that the court  would “lose the opportunity to provide meaningful relief” once the mandate goes into effect if it did not issue an injunction immediately.

Shortly before 5 p.m., Sotomayor acted on the challengers’ request alone, without calling for a response from the city or referring the case to the full court. Justice Amy Coney Barrett followed a similar path last month, when she turned down an emergency request from Indiana University students seeking to block the university’s vaccine requirement without seeking a response from the state or referring the case to her colleagues for a vote.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies