Amy Howe

Mar 1 2022

Jackson submits Senate Judiciary questionnaire, prepares to start meeting with senators

Just four days after President Joe Biden nominated her to succeed Justice Stephen Breyer, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson submitted her responses to a questionnaire that the Senate Judiciary Committee will use as it considers her nomination. Her responses repeat many of the details in the questionnaire that she submitted in 2021 when she was nominated to her current position on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. But Jackson’s Supreme Court questionnaire does provide new information about the nomination process and her approach to potential conflicts of interest.

Jackson revealed that Biden’s White House counsel, Dana Remus, first contacted her about the possibility of filling Breyer’s seat on Jan. 30 – three days after Breyer officially announced his retirement in a letter to the president. Jackson met with Vice President Kamala Harris on Zoom less than two weeks later, on Feb. 11; three days after that, on Feb. 14, she met with Biden and Remus at the White House. Biden officially offered Jackson the job on Feb. 24, and he announced the nomination the following day.

Like other Supreme Court nominees before her, Jackson pledged to resolve potential conflicts of interest by consulting the code of conduct that governs federal judges, although that code does not formally bind Supreme Court justices. She also pledged to take the additional step of seeking “guidance from judicial ethics officials to structure my limited financial investments to minimize the potential for conflicts.” Some groups advocating for court reform, most notably the nonpartisan group Fix the Court, have called for the justices to minimize their ownership of individual stocks, which would reduce the number of cases in which the justices would need to recuse themselves for financial reasons. In February, the Senate approved legislation that would require the justices (and all other federal judges) to promptly disclose their stock trades in an online database. The bill is similar to a measure that the House approved in December.

Jackson is scheduled to meet with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the Senate majority leader, on Wednesday morning. It is the first of what is expected to be a series of courtesy calls with senators before her Senate Judiciary Committee hearings. The hearings have not yet been scheduled, although Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., who chairs the committee, has said that he would like to wrap up the confirmation process by April 9.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog. 

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court rules for deaf student in education-law case
  • Parties disagree over court’s power to reach decision in election law case
  • Justices throw out lower-court ruling allowing state court clerk to be sued in parental notification abortion case
  • Justices decline to halt execution of Texas man with intellectual disability claim
  • Justices take up case on federal admiralty law, seek government’s views on two pending petitions
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies