Amy Howe

Oct 11 2022

Justice Department urges court to stay out of Mar-a-Lago documents dispute

The Biden administration on Tuesday urged the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump’s request to reinstate a district judge’s order that would allow a special master to review about 100 classified documents seized from Trump’s home. The Justice Department called Judge Aileen Cannon’s order, which a federal appeals court put on hold last month, “unprecedented.”

The FBI seized 11,000 documents, including over 100 marked as classified, in an Aug. 8 search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. After Cannon granted Trump’s request to appoint a special master to review the documents and barred the government from using any of the documents as part of a criminal investigation, the Justice Department appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

In an unsigned opinion on Sept. 21, a three-judge panel – which included two judges appointed by Trump – agreed to freeze two parts of Cannon’s order: one part requiring the DOJ to allow the special master to review the classified documents and another part barring the DOJ from using the classified documents in a criminal investigation.

Trump came to the Supreme Court last week, asking the justices to revive the portion of Cannon’s order that required the government to turn over the documents marked as classified.

In a 32-page filing, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the justices should leave the 11th Circuit’s ruling, which she characterizes as a “modest partial stay,” in place. Trump has not even tried to explain, she noted, why he would be permanently injured – one criteria for emergency relief – if the special master does not have access to the classified documents for a short time.

And in any event, Prelogar continued, Trump also is not entitled to emergency relief because he has not shown that the court of appeals was clearly wrong in putting part of Cannon’s order on hold. Although Cannon appointed Senior U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master, to determine whether any of the seized documents were protected by executive privilege or attorney-client privilege or belonged to Trump, Trump “has no plausible claim of privilege in or ownership of government records bearing classification markings,” Prelogar wrote.

Trump’s contention that the 11th Circuit lacked the power to block the special master’s review of the classified documents also falls short, Prelogar argued, for a variety of independent reasons – including that an order to turn over classified documents can be immediately reviewed, because otherwise the appeal of the order “will likely be futile once disclosure has occurred.” But in any event, Prelogar concluded, the court of appeals was not clearly wrong when it determined that it did have the power to intervene.

Trump’s legal team can file a response to the DOJ brief. Once it does, the court could act on his request at any time.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • David Souter, retired Supreme Court justice, dies at 85
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies