Amy Howe

May 23 2023

Reading the tea leaves — Part 1

As we approach the final opinion day scheduled in May, the court still has 33 opinions to release before the justices’ summer recess. Those 33 opinions include the opinions in high-profile cases involving the consideration of race in college admissions, the challenge to the Biden administration’s student-debt relief program, and the constitutionality of a 1978 law that regulates the adoption of Native American children.

With the justices’ release of six opinions last week, and five the week before that, it is finally possible to draw some conclusions about who may (or may not) be writing some of the remaining opinions. As a reminder, the justices try very hard to divide up the workload evenly not only over the course of the term, but also from argument session to argument session. For example, if there are nine arguments in a particular session, it would normally mean that each justice would be responsible for drafting one opinion. Therefore, if a justice has already written an opinion in a sitting, he or she is not likely to have another one for that month.

For the court’s October argument session, there are two cases that have not yet been decided: the regulatory/environmental case Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency; and the voting rights case Allen (formerly Merrill) v. Milligan. Three justices – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas – have not yet written opinions for October, so two of those three are almost certainly the authors of Sackett and Allen, although at this point there’s no way to know who may be drafting which ones. But in any event, that likely bodes well for the Sacketts and, in all likelihood, Alabama.

There are too many cases remaining from the November argument session (six) to make any real predictions about who might be writing them. There are four cases remaining from the December argument session: United States v. Texas, the challenge to a Biden administration immigration policy; 303 Creative v. Elenis, a web designer’s challenge to a Colorado law that bars businesses that serve the public from discriminating against gay people; the False Claims Act case United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources; and the election-law case Moore v. Harper. Four justices have not yet written opinions for December: Roberts and Justices Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh.

There is only one case from the January argument session that has not yet been decided: Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, involving preemption and the National Labor Relations Act. There were only seven arguments in all of January, one of which – In re Grand Jury – was dismissed as improvidently granted, so four justices – Roberts, Alito and Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Amy Coney Barrett – have not yet written, making it all but impossible at this point to say who might be writing in Glacier.

Here’s a full list of the term’s decided and as-yet-undecided cases, along with a tally of the number of opinions written by each justice so far. Justice Neil Gorsuch currently leads the pack with four opinions; by contrast, Roberts and Alito have each released just one so far.

October – 8 cases

Decided: 6

  • Delaware v. Pennsylvania & Wisconsin (Jackson)
  • Arellano v. McDonough (Barrett)
  • National Pork Producers Council v. Ross (Gorsuch)
  • Reed v. Goertz (Kavanaugh)
  • Helix Energy Solutions v. Hewitt (Kagan)
  • Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Sotomayor)

Remaining: 2

  • Sackett v. EPA
  • Allen (formerly Merrill) v. Milligan

Justices who have not yet written: Roberts, Thomas, Alito

November – 9

Decided: 3

  • Cruz v. Arizona (Sotomayor)
  • Bittner v. United States (Gorsuch)
  • SEC v. Cochran & Axon v. FTC (Kagan)

Remaining: 6

  • Students for Fair Admissions v. UNC
  • Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
  • Jones v. Hendrix
  • Mallory v. Norfolk Southern
  • Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski
  • Haaland v. Brackeen

Justices who have not yet written: Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson

December – 9

Decided: 5

  • Ciminelli v. US (Thomas)
  • Percoco v. US (Alito)
  • Wilkins v. US (Sotomayor)
  • MOAC Mall Holdings v. Transform Holdco (Jackson)
  • Bartenwerfer v. Buckley (Barrett)

Remaining: 4

  • US v. Texas
  • 303 Creative v. Elenis
  • S. ex rel Polansky v. Executive Health Resources
  • Moore v. Harper

Justices who have not yet written: Roberts, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh

January – 7

Decided: 6

  • Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. FLRA (Thomas)
  • In re Grand Jury (DIG)
  • Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo (Kagan)
  • Turkiye Halk Bankasi v. US (Kavanaugh)
  • Santos-Zacharia v. Garland (Jackson)
  • Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools (Gorsuch)

Remaining: 1

  • Glacier Northwest v. Int’l Brotherhood of Teamsters

Justices who have not yet written: Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor, Barrett

February – 6

Decided: 3

  • New York v. New Jersey (Kavanaugh)
  • Twitter v. Taamneh (Thomas)
  • Gonzalez v. Google (PC)

Remaining: 3

  • Dubin v. US
  • Biden v. Nebraska
  • Department of Education v. Brown

Justices who have not yet written: Roberts, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Barrett, Jackson

March – 10

Decided: 2

  • Amgen v. Sanofi (Gorsuch)
  • Polselli v. IRS (Roberts)

Remaining: 8

  • US v. Hansen
  • Arizona v. Navajo Nation
  • Coinbase v. Bielski
  • Abitron Austria v. Hetronic International
  • Jack Daniel’s Properties v. VIP Products
  • Lora v. US
  • Smith v. US
  • Samia v. US

Justices who have not yet written: Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Jackson

April – 9

Remaining: 9

  • Slack Technologies v. Pirani
  • Pugin v. Garland
  • Groff v. DeJoy
  • S. ex rel Schutte v. SuperValu
  • Counterman v. Colorado
  • Lac du Flambeau Band v. Coughlin
  • Dupree v. Younger
  • Yegiazaryan v. Smagin
  • Tyler v. Hennepin County

Justices who have not yet written: All

Number of opinions per justice

  • Roberts: 1
  • Thomas: 3
  • Alito: 1
  • Sotomayor: 3
  • Kagan: 3
  • Gorsuch: 4
  • Kavanaugh: 3
  • Barrett: 2
  • Jackson: 3
  • Per curiam: 1
  • DIG: 1

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
  • Supreme Court allows Trump to ban transgender people from military
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies