Amy Howe

Dec 11 2024

Supreme Court turns down Kentucky utility’s request to block EPA coal ash rule

The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a request from a Kentucky utility company to temporarily block an Environmental Protection Agency rule governing the disposal of coal ash while a challenge to it moves forward in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

The denial came just under six months after the Supreme Court, in Ohio v. Environmental Protection Agency, granted a plea from three states (as well as several companies and trade groups) to put on hold an EPA rule intended to reduce air pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities. Since then, however, the justices have turned down several other requests to temporarily block EPA rules while litigation continues in the lower courts.

The utility company, East Kentucky Power Cooperative, came to the court in early November, calling the rule “yet another aggressive attempt by EPA to push the envelope of its regulatory authority.” If the rule is not put on hold, it said, it would soon have to “ramp up” its efforts to comply, “culminating in the commencement of construction activities in March 2025.”

Representing the EPA, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar urged the justices not to intervene, telling them that the utility is unlikely to succeed in its challenge. Moreover, she added, the utility’s claim that it will be permanently harmed by the rule “rests primarily on shifting, unexplained, and implausible estimates of its compliance costs — which are hardly impending in any event, as the relevant compliance deadline will not arrive until March 2025.”

In a brief one-sentence order, the justices turned down the request without any comment. There were no dissents noted from the court’s order.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Supreme Court issues two rulings specifying where challenges to EPA actions on clean air must be filed
  • Court upholds Tennessee’s ban on certain medical treatments for transgender minors
  • Businesses challenge Trump’s tariffs before Supreme Court
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies