Amy Howe

Feb 27 2025

Chief justice pauses order for Trump to pay $2 billion in foreign-aid funding

Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday night temporarily froze an order by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that would have required the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign-aid reimbursements for work that has already been done. In a brief order issued just a few hours before the midnight deadline for the Trump administration to make those payments, Roberts signaled that the court is likely to move quickly on the Trump administration’s request to lift the order by U.S. District Judge Amir Ali, as he instructed the plaintiffs in the case to respond to that request by noon on Friday.

The dispute stems from an executive order issued by President Donald Trump last month declaring that foreign-aid funds “are not aligned with American interests and in many cases antithetical to American values.” Therefore, Trump directed, going forward, foreign-aid funds should not be disbursed “in a manner that is not fully aligned with the foreign policy of the President,” and he instructed agencies to “immediately pause new obligations and disbursements of development assistance funds to foreign countries” and the organizations and contractors that implement those projects to give the agencies time to conduct a review of their foreign-aid programs.

Following this executive order, Secretary of State Marco Rubio imposed a pause on foreign-aid programs funded by or through both the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development.

The plaintiffs, groups that either receive or have members that receive foreign-aid funds, went to federal court in Washington, D.C., where they contended that the decision to pause foreign-aid funds violated both the federal law governing administrative agencies and the Constitution.

On Feb. 13, Ali issued an order that barred the State Department and USAID from suspending foreign-aid payments. And 12 days later, on Feb. 25, he ordered the agencies to pay contractors and grant recipients by 11:59 p.m. on Feb. 26 for work that had already been done before he issued his Feb. 13 order.

Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris came to the Supreme Court on Wednesday. She asked the justices to do two things: First, act immediately to temporarily pause Ali’s order before the midnight deadline for the State Department to make the payments; and, second, eventually lift the order altogether.

Harris told the court that Ali’s order “effectively allows a single federal district court to supervise the federal government’s contracting decisions regarding foreign aid—an area where the Executive Branch ordinarily has the broadest discretion.” Moreover, she added, Ali did not even have the power to issue such an order, because claims “that the government owes money under its contracts and other funding instruments” can only be brought in an entirely different court, the Court of Federal Claims.

Harris contended that “the government is committed to paying legitimate claims for work that was properly completed pursuant to intact obligations and supported by proper documentation.” But, she continued, what “the government cannot do is pay arbitrarily determined demands on an arbitrary timeline of the district court’s choosing or according to extra-contractual rules that the court has devised.”

In an order released to reporters shortly before 9:30 p.m. on Wednesday night, Roberts granted Harris’s request and put Ali’s order on hold temporarily – a procedure known as an “administrative stay,” which is intended to give the court time to consider a request for emergency action. He directed the plaintiffs to respond to the Trump administration’s application by noon on Friday.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog. 

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Questions about Thursday’s oral argument in the birthright citizenship dispute? We have (some) answers. 
  • Unions, advocacy group tell justices not to let DOGE access Social Security records
  • David Souter, retired Supreme Court justice, dies at 85
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies