Amy Howe

Dec 12 2022

Court orders oral argument in N.Y.-N.J. dispute and requests government’s views on two pending petitions

The Supreme Court called for oral argument in a dispute between New York and New Jersey over New Jersey’s efforts to withdraw from a 1953 agreement involving seaport security. That announcement came on the list of orders from last week’s conference, released on Monday morning.

In late June, the justices granted New York’s request to file a complaint under the court’s original jurisdiction – that is, its power to hear disputes between the states without having to wait for the lower courts to consider them first. Monday morning’s order set the dispute in New York v. New Jersey for “oral argument in due course,” which is likely to mean sometime next spring. The justices will review New Jersey’s attempt to withdraw from the states’ Waterfront Commission Compact, which was formed to combat corruption at the New York Harbor.

The justices also asked for the Biden administration’s views on two pending petitions seeking the court’s review. In Buckner v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry, the justices have been asked to decide whether a coal company can be required to maintain health care benefits for retirees after bankruptcy. And in ML Genius Holdings v. Google, the question is whether the Copyright Act preempts a breach-of-contract claim by Genius, an online platform for transcribing song lyrics, against Google, for violating its promise not to use content from Genius for commercial purposes. There is no deadline for the U.S. solicitor general to file her briefs.

The justices’ next scheduled conference is on Jan. 6, 2023.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
  • Supreme Court allows Trump to ban transgender people from military
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies