Amy Howe

Mar 20 2025

Former clerk tapped for fall double jeopardy argument

The Supreme Court has tapped a former clerk to Justice Sonia Sotomayor to defend a lower court ruling in next term’s Barrett v. United States, a New York man’s challenge to his robbery convictions and sentences under two federal laws. The federal government, which prevailed in the lower court last May, has declined to defend that ruling at the Supreme Court.

The justices appointed Charles L. McCloud to brief and argue the case. Dwayne Barrett, who was involved in a series of armed robberies, argues that the Constitution’s double jeopardy clause prohibits him from receiving two separate sentences – one for violating a federal law that makes it a crime to use a gun during a crime of violence and a second one for murder or manslaughter during a robbery.

When a federal appeals court rejected his argument, Barrett came to the Supreme Court, which agreed on March 3 to take up his case.

The federal government had urged the justices to deny Barrett’s petition for review, stressing that Barrett had not yet been resentenced. Even if imposing the two sentences violates the double jeopardy clause, the government explained, either “the district court could structure” his sentence or the government might ask to have one of the charges dismissed, which would “avoid any constitutional violation or render it harmless.” But the government acknowledged that it had “long taken the position that cumulative punishment” like the kind at issue in Barrett’s case “is not permitted.”

With the government opting not to defend the 2nd Circuit’s decision, the justices on Wednesday appointed McCloud to do so. The practice of appointing an outside attorney is not an uncommon one, though the justices have appointed a particularly high number – six – for the 2024-25 term.

McCloud is a partner at Williams & Connolly, a law firm in Washington, D.C. Before clerking for Sotomayor, he clerked for then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and for Judge Paul Niemeyer of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit. He served as an assistant to the U.S. solicitor general from January 2023 until the summer of 2024, arguing two cases in the Supreme Court.

Barrett’s case will be argued sometime in the fall.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • David Souter, retired Supreme Court justice, dies at 85
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies