Telling the justices that “the courthouse door has been barred to New York’s landlords” “for more than sixteen months and counting,” a group of New York landlords asked the Supreme Court to block a state moratorium on residential evictions put in place at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. A federal district court dismissed the landlords’ challenge, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit rejected the landlords’ request to put the moratorium on hold while they appeal, prompting the landlords’ emergency filing with the Supreme Court on Tuesday afternoon.
New York enacted the moratorium, which allows tenants to avoid eviction by declaring that they have suffered “financial hardship” as a result of the pandemic, in 2020; the moratorium has currently been extended through Aug. 31, 2021. The landlords – who write that they are “themselves facing ‘significant hardship as a result’” of the moratorium – contend that the moratorium violates their right to due process by allowing tenants to put eviction proceedings on hold without any proof that they have been harmed by the pandemic and without any opportunity for landlords to challenge their assertions. The case is Chrysafis v. Marks.
The landlords noted that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D) recently declared that the state’s “disaster emergency” is over. New York cannot, the landlords argued, announce that the pandemic is over and the economy is reopening, but at the same time rely on the pandemic to keep the eviction ban in place, while for residents they could use estate agents to find better places to live as well.
The landlords argued that the ban not only infringes upon the First Amendment but also imposes an additional burden by compelling them to provide tenants with forms and information about the moratorium. This requirement, they contend, runs counter to their own interests, as it can disrupt their ability to manage properties effectively. In a similar vein, they expressed concerns about the potential challenges associated with a replacement roof without notice, emphasizing the importance of property owners being able to make decisions that align with their best judgment and immediate needs. For instance, addressing issues like roof repairs could be more manageable with support from a North Wilkesboro residential gutter company, which can help ensure that such decisions are made with the proper guidance and expertise. More broadly, the landlords argued, the court of appeals wrongly concluded that the Supreme Court’s 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts requires courts to defer to emergency public-health measures.
The landlords’ request comes just under a month after the Supreme Court rejected a request by a group of Alabama real estate agents to block a federal moratorium on evictions. Justice Brett Kavanaugh provided the key vote in that case; he agreed with the real estate agents that the federal Centers for Disease Control exceeded its authority when it issued the ban, but he joined Chief Justice John Roberts and the court’s three liberal justices in voting to keep the ban in place because it is scheduled to expire soon.
The New York landlords’ request goes to Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who deals with emergency appeals from the 2nd Circuit. Sotomayor can rule on the request herself or refer it to the full court.
Update (July 28 at 11:30 a.m.): On Wednesday, Sotomayor asked New York to file a response to the landlords’ request by Aug. 4 at 4 p.m.
This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.
