Amy Howe

Apr 4 2022

Jackson’s confirmation expected by end of week after committee deadlocks along partisan lines

The Senate Judiciary Committee deadlocked 11-11 along party lines on the nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to succeed Justice Stephen Breyer, who plans to retire from the Supreme Court this summer. Despite the tie vote on Monday, Jackson’s nomination can still go to the Senate floor using a procedure known as a discharge petition and a simple majority vote to place Jackson’s nomination on the calendar. Once there, Democrats expect to confirm Jackson before the Senate adjourns for its Easter recess at the end of this week.

Three Republicans – Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah – have announced that they will vote for Jackson, virtually assuring her confirmation.

After four days of contentious hearings before the Judiciary Committee last month, the committee reconvened Monday for its final business on Jackson’s nomination. The vote followed over three hours of remarks by members of the committee outlining either their support or opposition. Some Republicans couched their criticisms of Jackson in praise, with Sen. Mike Lee of Utah describing her “impressive qualifications” and Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, who overlapped at Harvard Law School with Jackson, characterizing her as “charming” and “talented” and noting that he had “always liked her personally.” But they assailed what Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa portrayed as her “lenient approach to criminal law and sentencing,” particularly when it came to sentencings for defendants convicted of child pornography offenses.

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri rejected the argument that Jackson and other federal judges had imposed sentences that were lower than what the federal sentencing guidelines had recommended because the guidelines are outdated. The guidelines, for instance, call for enhanced sentences for defendants who use computers to view images of child sex abuse, but many experts have argued that, in the digital age, an enhancement tied to the use of a computer is no longer a reliable gauge of the relative seriousness of a crime.

Republicans also complained about the Democrats’ past and present treatment of conservative judicial nominees. Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina lamented that Jackson was the first Black woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court only because Democrats had filibustered Janice Rogers Brown, a justice on the California Supreme Court, when President George W. Bush nominated her for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Brown was eventually confirmed to the D.C. Circuit after two years and served on that court for 12 years before stepping down in 2017; neither Bush nor President Donald Trump nominated her for the Supreme Court vacancies that occurred during their terms in office. Graham warned that if Republicans were to regain control of the Senate, someone like Jackson “would not have been before this committee.” “You would have had someone more moderate than this,” Graham added.

Democrats countered by emphasizing both Jackson’s credentials and the historic nature of her nomination. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut called Jackson’s nomination a “joyous and historic moment for all of America” and contended that having Jackson on the court would make it “look more like America and think more like America.” Blumenthal described himself as “excited” and “proud” about the nomination but also “sad” because of the partisan divide over this “extraordinarily well-qualified nominee.”

Sen. Mazie Hirono of Hawaii pushed back against the Republicans’ portrayal of Jackson as soft on crime, depicting Jackson as a “mainstream judge” whose sentences are in line with those of judges from around the country, nominated by presidents of both parties.

Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey – who invoked Festivus, the fictional Seinfeld holiday with its “airing of the grievances,” to describe the Republicans’ complaints about historical wrongs – noted that two major law-enforcement groups, the Fraternal Order of Police and the International Association of Chiefs of Police – are supporting Jackson’s nomination. Calling Jackson an extremist on crime, Booker noted, would mean that the FOP is soft on crime.

The committee put off its vote until Monday afternoon because Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., was delayed in returning to Washington after a passenger on his flight experienced a medical emergency, causing the flight to return to Los Angeles on Sunday night. When the committee finally voted, all 11 Democrats voted for Jackson, while all 11 Republicans voted against her.

This post is also published on SCOTUSblog.

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Venezuelan TPS recipients tell justices to let status stand
  • Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens
  • Supreme Court allows Trump to ban transgender people from military
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Court appears to back legality of HHS preventative care task force
  • Justices take up Texas woman’s claim against USPS
  • Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes
  • Justices temporarily bar government from removing Venezuelan men under Alien Enemies Act
  • Court hears challenge to ACA preventative-care coverage
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies