Amy Howe

Dec 10 2018

Justices to consider constitutionality of cross-shaped war memorial on public land: In Plain English

Over the years, the Supreme Court has sometimes struggled to explain when and why religious symbols are permitted in the public sphere and when they are not. Sometime early in 2019, the justices will hear oral argument in a dispute over the constitutionality of a cross that sits on a traffic median in the suburbs… Read More

Dec 10 2018

One new grant, one dissent from the denial of review

Last week the justices added one new case to their merits docket for the term – a relatively obscure maritime-law case. Somewhat unexpectedly, they added another new case today that will almost certainly have a much higher profile, at least in the legal world: Kisor v. Wilkie, in which the Supreme Court will consider whether… Read More

Dec 7 2018

One new grant today

This afternoon the justices issued an initial set of orders from their private conference today. They added just one new case, involving maritime law, to their merits docket for the term; they did not act on any of the higher-profile cases that they considered this morning, involving issues ranging from partisan gerrymandering to the death… Read More

Dec 6 2018

Argument analysis: Majority appears ready to uphold “separate sovereigns” doctrine

When Terance Gamble was pulled over by police in Alabama three years ago for having a faulty headlight, he probably didn’t think that prosecutors would make a federal case out of it. And he certainly wouldn’t have imagined that his case would make national headlines – not so much for its own sake, but because… Read More

Dec 5 2018

Government files invitation briefs, recommends just one grant

In the past few days, the federal government has filed a bevy of briefs expressing the views of the United States on issues ranging from the interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act to California’s ban on foie gras. The justices often pay close attention to the government’s recommendations; if they follow that practice here,… Read More

Dec 3 2018

Two new CVSGs – on a deadline

This morning the Supreme Court issued orders from the justices’ private conference last week. The justices did not add any new cases to their docket for the term, but they did ask the U.S. solicitor general to weigh in on a pair of cases involving the Clean Water Act – and in doing so took… Read More

Nov 29 2018

Argument preview: Justices to reconsider potentially far reaching double-jeopardy exception

Next week the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the case of an Alabama man who was convicted of both federal and state gun charges arising from the same traffic stop. He is challenging what is known as the “separate sovereigns” doctrine – the idea, based on longstanding Supreme Court rulings, that the federal… Read More

Nov 28 2018

Justices release January calendar

The Supreme Court will ring in 2019 with a nearly full argument calendar. Today the justices released the calendar for the January 2019 sitting, which begins on January 7. The justices will hear oral argument in five cases (two per day on Monday and Tuesday, followed by one on Wednesday) during the first week of… Read More

Nov 28 2018

Argument analysis: Court appears ready to rule that Constitution’s bar on excessive fines applies to the states

Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of Tyson Timbs, an Indiana man who lost his 2012 Land Rover after he pleaded guilty to drug charges. The state argued that it could seize the car because it had been used to transport drugs, but Timbs countered that requiring him to forfeit the… Read More

Nov 27 2018

In a letter, government “suggests” hold for trial in census citizenship dispute

On November 16, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear oral argument in February in a dispute over evidence in the challenge to the Trump administration’s decision to bring back a question about citizenship on the 2020 census. Yesterday the federal government took the unusual step of sending a letter to the Supreme Court… Read More

Amy L Howe
Until September 2016, Amy served as the editor and reporter for SCOTUSblog, a blog devoted to coverage of the Supreme Court of the United States; she continues to serve as an independent contractor and reporter for SCOTUSblog. Before turning to full-time blogging, she served as counsel in over two dozen merits cases at the Supreme Court and argued two cases there. From 2004 until 2011, she co-taught Supreme Court litigation at Stanford Law School; from 2005 until 2013, she co-taught a similar class at Harvard Law School. She has also served as an adjunct professor at American University’s Washington College of Law and Vanderbilt Law School. Amy is a graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and holds a master’s degree in Arab Studies and a law degree from Georgetown University.
Tweets by @AHoweBlogger
Recent ScotusBlog Posts from Amy
  • Justices request government’s views on Harvard affirmative-action dispute
  • Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020
  • Justices grant state secrets case, won’t tackle male-only draft
More from Amy Howe

Recent Posts

  • Reading the tea leaves: Remaining cases as of June 16
  • Federal government weighs in on five cases for June 24 conference
  • Justices request government’s views on Harvard affirmative-action dispute
  • Reading the tea leaves: Remaining cases as of June 13
  • Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020
PREV 1 … 11 12 13 … 40 NEXT
Site built and optimized by Sound Strategies